Utbildning och Human Rights: Safety as a Fundamental Right for Patients"

EU-Kommissionens 27 Kommissionärer – ”le Collège” – skall avgå!

Socialminister Gunnar Häggund skall till TV 4 Kalla Fakta redovisa hur en nollvision för vårdskador skall gå till. Vid EU-läkares "automatiska överföringar" av EU-Diplom (med stöd av EU Direktiv 2005:36) ingår inga gränsöverskridande patientförsäkringar.

Ingen patienter får ekonomisk gottgörelser och kan återkalla falska specialisters EU-Diplom med stöd av 27 § Förvaltningslagen. Se dom 2008-12-29 i målen nr 701-703-08 hos Länsrätten i Uppsala jfr. med B14719-08 hos Stockholms tingsrätt och nerlagt mål B13918-07 mot Socialstyrelsen.

Varför ger inte dessa "stafettläkare" in F-skattsedlar och inbetalar erhållna svenska arbetsgivaravgifter vid tillfälliga arbeten hos Landstingen i Sverige?
The following gross & systematic violations of Human Rights in Sweden are no ”acceptable” errors: (Se Beslutet 2009-02-09 av EU-Kommissionens DG Internal Market, Unit Regulated Professions #019697, COM 2008/4716):

"Safety as a Fundamental Right for Patients":

Micro aspects:
I have introduced Cases in the Swedish and Norwegian Courts, as well as lobbied at DG Internal Market, Unit Regulated Professions (see Decision 2007-10-15 on the introduction of IMI, Internal Market Information system) for ensuring patients´ safety with immigrating Doctors.
The flood-gates of "Light Specializations" and Doctored Evidence have just opened:
See the Swedish television and www.tv4.se/samhalle/kalla_fakta

Macro aspects:
My Complaints to the ECHR, the EFTA-Court and the EU-Commission endeavor to bridge the Lacuna (Annex VII, Article 50) in EU-Directive 2005:36 with direct effects of the ECHR. With, or without the Lisbon Treaty, a guideline is needed for the future two-way European system: Who is the interpreter in an alleged conflict between fundamental rights and the validity of Community law and non-actions of the EU-institutions?
(Article 230 EC and the ECJ´ supremacy).

See the blanket of confidentiality in Decision 2009-01-29 by 27 EU-Commissioners to avoid any conflict between 2 supra-national courts in defining a tolerable level of Doctors´ cross-border fraud and falsified identifications and Patients´ zero tolerance.

The College´s closed infringement procedure (COM 2008/4716 Bergling v. Sweden) omitted to state if Sweden´s breach of its obligations under ECHR is relevant to the legal analysis in the terms of Community law: Article 2 Right to Life and the First Protocol, Article 2 by issued Equal EU-Diplomas for un-Equal Higher Education to non-residents.

Global aspects:
By my pending Applications against Sweden, Norway and Belgium, I wish to implement the concept of the Inter-American Human Rights:

A duty of the High Contraction Party in breach with ECHR to the publish Verdict in the national press as compensations for the victims and their family.

Yannike BERGLING
yannike2007@hotmail.fr